Economic Update: Capitalism and Democracy

Direct Download

On this week's Economic Update, Prof. Wolff provides updates on Puerto Rico, slave labor in the cocoa fields, worsening UK inequality, leaders imposing austerity on others, Canada's Girl Guides among tourists to shun US. Major discussions: rising US wage inequality; connection and opposition between capitalism and democracy; key differences between capitalist and worker-coop enterprises.


Showing 3 comments

  • commented 2017-04-01 04:21:20 -0400
    Next time you’re talking about landlords, housing, and immigrants, who are “bolstering the tax rolls” by moving into ghettos and helping slumlords pay taxes on their dilapidated buildings, please mention that realestate developers (and the banks that finance them) are underwritten and subsidized with loan guarantees by Federal, State, and Local government with taxpayer money. And please also mention that there wouldn’t be a housing issue if 19 billion dollars per year in Federal public housing assistance was not re-directed to prisons, beginning with the Clinton Administration. Please talk about how the US pursued a bank-subsidized, for-profit housing model, while Europe embraced housing as a right.
  • commented 2017-04-01 04:19:21 -0400
    Next time you’re talking about landlords, housing, and immigrants, who are “bolstering the tax rolls” by moving into ghettos and helping slumlords pay taxes on their dilapidated buildings, please mention that realestate developers (and the banks that finance them) are underwritten and subsidized with loan guarantees by Federal, State, and Local government with taxpayer money. And please also mention that there wouldn’t be a housing issue if 19 billion dollars per year in Federal public housing assistance was re-directed to prisons, beginning with the Clinton Administration. Please talk about how the US pursued a bank-subsidized, for-profit housing model, while Europe embraced housing as a right.
  • commented 2017-03-27 19:45:50 -0400
    The comment about there being a very few people who own and control our big corporations got me thinking. I do own some stock but certainly not enough to control or even influence any corporation. But from time to time I get a notice of a stockholders meeting and an invitation to attend – usually at some distant city where the cost to me of attending is, if not more, at least a significant percentage of what my stock in the company is worth. I’ve never been to one of these meetings of course.

    But I am offered an alternative – to sign over my right to vote to the management. Or some times I am given a list of names of candidates and perhaps a few words about their experience and asked to vote on these proposed board members. I generally toss this opportunity in a convenient basket and forget about the issue.

    My shares do not make any difference, but perhaps the combined shares of a large number of shareholders would. Is this possible? I don’t know. It would be interesting to find out.

    If some organization that could be trusted to be working in the public interest wanted, I suspect there would be quite a few small stockholders who would be willing to sign over their proxies to that organization instead of tossing them into the basket. Perhaps at times that organization could make good use of this combined power.
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Become a Monthly

d@w

Supporter

Sign Up!

Upcoming Events

International Conference: Marx's Capital after 150 Years: Critique and Alternative to Capitalism

When: May 24, 2017 04:00—04:00PM

Where: The Marx Collegium York University

What: Presented by Marcello Musto

d@w-San Diego Monthly Action Group Meeting

When: May 28, 2017 12:30—03:30PM

Where: North University Community Branch Library

What: Presented by George Kallas

View All Events


Facebook Friends:

Which of your Facebook friends have joined

d@w

Connect to Find Out:


patreon_promo-01.png


action_promo-01.png