Cities After... The Growing Suburban Divide: COVID-19 Boomtowns and the Future of Sprawl - Pt. 1


[S02 E01] New

Direct Download

Welcome to Season Two of Cities After! Prof. Robles-Duran begins this season with a series of four episodes in which to make sense of the growing suburban divide in the United States by honing in on it's divisive politics, the consequential production of COVID-19 boomtowns, and the future of sprawl. 

In this first episode, Prof. Robles-Duran gives a brief overview of the primitive accumulation that gave rise to American Suburbia together with its racist, patriarchal and capitalist ideologies. This will serve as a basis to further delve into the contemporary phenomenon of post-COVID sprawl and its social, political, economic and environmental consequences to the near future of American cities and their inhabitants.

Cities After... is a Democracy At Work production. Launched in May of 2021, it is a bi-monthly podcast about the future of cities; grounded in our daily urban struggles, it is part dystopian and part utopian. The intention is to entice civic imagination into action, because a more just and sustainable urban future is possible. A new episode is released every other Tuesday at 4pm EST.
We are committed to providing these podcasts to you free of ads. Help us keep this show sustainable by supporting Cities After... via the links below.
LEARN MORE about this new podcast: Cities After... hosted by Miguel Robles-Duran

Check out the NEW 2021 Hardcover edition of “Understanding Marxism,” with a new, lengthy introduction by Richard Wolff! Now available at: lulu.com

“Marxism always was the critical shadow of capitalism. Their interactions changed them both. Now Marxism is once again stepping into the light as capitalism shakes from its own excesses and confronts decline.”

Check out all of d@w’s books: "The Sickness is the System," "Understanding Socialism," by Richard D. Wolff, and “Stuck Nation” by Bob Hennelly at http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/democracyatwork

Follow us ONLINE:

Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/DemocracyatWrk

Twitter:  http://twitter.com/democracyatwrk

Instagram:  http://instagram.com/democracyatwrk

Shop our CO-OP made MERCH:  https://democracy-at-work-shop.myshopify.com/

Showing 2 comments

  • Martin Holsinger
    commented 2022-10-10 15:58:01 -0400
    Overall, this is one of the best “Cities After” podcasts I have heard. Robles-Duran introduced me to the direct link between McCarthyism and Levittown. That was quite a revelation!

    However, the podcast opens with an error of fact that some might find offputting. Herbert Hoover was not the President in 1920. he was the Secretary of Commerce. However, he was so active as SoC, and Harding, the actual President, was so inactive, that many at the time regarded Hoover as the main mover and shaker in the Harding administration.
  • Edward Dodson
    commented 2022-01-12 12:22:33 -0500
    The history of suburban development in the U.S. has complex causes. Until well into the 1970s the quality of urban life was quite low for many if not most people. The allocation of huge amounts of federal funds into highway expansion opened up land outside of the urban core for development of residential subdivisions and the retail and service businesses servicing the needs of suburban dwellers. And, eventually, manufacturing firms abandoned their urban locations, acquiring enough land for current use as well as future expansion. Urban neighborhoods that arose to serve urban manufacturing businesses were gradually abandoned by the working middle class, conveyed to speculators who offered the properties for lease to low income households.

    The one change in public policy that could have effectively mitigated this outmigration of people and businesses was identified in the late 1960s by the commission headed by former Senator Paul Douglas. The form of property taxation in effect in almost all communities across the United States was a primary cause. Housing units and other buildings (which are depreciating assets) were overtaxed. The annual tax on buildings equated to a sales tax paid year after year. The optimum rate of taxation on building values, from the standpoint of economic efficiency, is zero.

    What communities provide are locations on which to construct housing and other buildings and to conduct business. The value of locations is community-created, by the quality of public goods and services brought to locations and by the population growth that translates into increasing demand for locations based on actual and perceived locational advantages. Every parcel or tract of land in a community has some potential annual rental value based on the above characteristics. This is the value that rightfully belongs to the community, that should be collected via taxation. Unfortunately, almost everywhere assessment practices failed to reflect the current market value of land. Low effective rates of taxation financially benefitting those who held land vacant or under-improved. Thus, even in the financial districts of cities many land parcels (even entire blocks) remain vacant for years or even decades.

    A handful of communities in the U.S. came to understand the problem described above. One, the capital of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, began to restructure its city property tax in the 1970s. At the time, Harrisburg was thought to be one of the most distressed cities in the country. Slowly, the city fathers approved shifts in property tax rates off of buildings and onto land values. Today, Harrisburg imposes a rate 6 times higher on assessed land values than on its buildings. Its mayors have repeatedly endorsed this change, pointing to many positive improvements in the quality of life in the city. Another 20 towns, boroughs and school districts have moved in a similar direction in Pennsylvania.

    Sprawl is here. With sound public policies — including the move to a land value only property tax structure — people will return to the cities. Sprawl can be halted in time.

Customized by

Longleaf Digital